<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twin vs. Twin &#8211; Travers or Fletcher?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nancy.cc/2009/11/10/twin-vs-twin-travers-or-fletcher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nancy.cc/2009/11/10/twin-vs-twin-travers-or-fletcher/</link>
	<description>Need a baby name? I&#039;d love to help.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.nancy.cc/2009/11/10/twin-vs-twin-travers-or-fletcher/comment-page-1/#comment-346679</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancy.cc/?p=8473#comment-346679</guid>
		<description>I can see Travers being perpetually misspelled as Travis. 

I have a partiality to Fletcher, and have known men named Fletcher (oft shortened to Fletch). However, my partiality is because a fletcher is the person who puts the feathers on an arrow, which are called fletch themselves. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see Travers being perpetually misspelled as Travis. </p>
<p>I have a partiality to Fletcher, and have known men named Fletcher (oft shortened to Fletch). However, my partiality is because a fletcher is the person who puts the feathers on an arrow, which are called fletch themselves. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.nancy.cc/2009/11/10/twin-vs-twin-travers-or-fletcher/comment-page-1/#comment-346660</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancy.cc/?p=8473#comment-346660</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a huge fan of either name, but I think I&#039;d have to go with Fletcher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a huge fan of either name, but I think I&#8217;d have to go with Fletcher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dearest</title>
		<link>http://www.nancy.cc/2009/11/10/twin-vs-twin-travers-or-fletcher/comment-page-1/#comment-346652</link>
		<dc:creator>Dearest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancy.cc/?p=8473#comment-346652</guid>
		<description>Travers is best in my eyes... Fletcher sounds too harsh for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Travers is best in my eyes&#8230; Fletcher sounds too harsh for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CN Heidelberg</title>
		<link>http://www.nancy.cc/2009/11/10/twin-vs-twin-travers-or-fletcher/comment-page-1/#comment-346632</link>
		<dc:creator>CN Heidelberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancy.cc/?p=8473#comment-346632</guid>
		<description>Ouch.  I really can&#039;t decide.  I was going to go with Fletcher because it seemed less bad to have an -er surname as a first name than an -s surname, but really?  Both names sound kind of snivelly and lame to me.  (I&#039;m sure their bearers are perfectly awesome.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch.  I really can&#8217;t decide.  I was going to go with Fletcher because it seemed less bad to have an -er surname as a first name than an -s surname, but really?  Both names sound kind of snivelly and lame to me.  (I&#8217;m sure their bearers are perfectly awesome.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
