<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I No Longer Care for The Baby Name Wizard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nancy.cc/2009/11/16/why-i-no-longer-care-for-the-baby-name-wizard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nancy.cc/2009/11/16/why-i-no-longer-care-for-the-baby-name-wizard/</link>
	<description>Need a baby name? I&#039;d love to help.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.nancy.cc/2009/11/16/why-i-no-longer-care-for-the-baby-name-wizard/comment-page-1/#comment-347777</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancy.cc/?p=7896#comment-347777</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good point. I&#039;m sure many people who inadvertently choose trendy names change their story after the fact to make the names seem more legitimate/authentic. (I would certainly be tempted.)

And I can&#039;t fault the Wizard book for getting people to think a bit harder about baby names. I think that&#039;s a great accomplishment.

I just worry that all its talk of image and style and popularity will convince people think that these are the most important factors to consider, or, worse, the &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; factors to consider. Kinda like baby naming-tunnel vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point. I&#8217;m sure many people who inadvertently choose trendy names change their story after the fact to make the names seem more legitimate/authentic. (I would certainly be tempted.)</p>
<p>And I can&#8217;t fault the Wizard book for getting people to think a bit harder about baby names. I think that&#8217;s a great accomplishment.</p>
<p>I just worry that all its talk of image and style and popularity will convince people think that these are the most important factors to consider, or, worse, the <em>only</em> factors to consider. Kinda like baby naming-tunnel vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CN Heidelberg</title>
		<link>http://www.nancy.cc/2009/11/16/why-i-no-longer-care-for-the-baby-name-wizard/comment-page-1/#comment-347725</link>
		<dc:creator>CN Heidelberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancy.cc/?p=7896#comment-347725</guid>
		<description>I definitely prefer the reasoning that the parents like the name rather than they like the style of it, but in the end you can&#039;t often tell the difference anyway.  Many people will be revisionist and say it was because they liked a name even if they had other reasons, or will say it was for some far-fetched reason because they don&#039;t want to admit they just liked a name that everyone else also liked (they want to stake a more valid claim on it). 
I think Wizard is just tapping into a huge audience of people who do care more about what everyone else will think of the name than what they think of it.  To a certain extent they are right (you don&#039;t want to give your kid a name that will end up causing them a lot of pain because it&#039;s really not in style), but it ends up just turning style over faster and ensuring everything ends up dated more quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely prefer the reasoning that the parents like the name rather than they like the style of it, but in the end you can&#8217;t often tell the difference anyway.  Many people will be revisionist and say it was because they liked a name even if they had other reasons, or will say it was for some far-fetched reason because they don&#8217;t want to admit they just liked a name that everyone else also liked (they want to stake a more valid claim on it).<br />
I think Wizard is just tapping into a huge audience of people who do care more about what everyone else will think of the name than what they think of it.  To a certain extent they are right (you don&#8217;t want to give your kid a name that will end up causing them a lot of pain because it&#8217;s really not in style), but it ends up just turning style over faster and ensuring everything ends up dated more quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
