Popular, trendy, and noteworthy baby names of 1909 (U.S.)

Baby name timeline 1909

Which baby names were the most popular in the U.S. in 1909?

Which names saw the steepest rises in usage?

And which names appeared for the very first time in the national dataset?

Below you’ll find the answers to all three of these questions.

Top names

These were the most popular baby names overall in the U.S. in 1909:

Girl names: Most popularBoy names: Most popular
1. Mary1. John
2. Helen2. William
3. Margaret3. James
4. Ruth4. George
5. Dorothy5. Robert

Rising names

These baby names saw the largest increases in usage from 1908 to 1909 in terms of number of babies:

Girl names: Top absolute increasesBoy names: Top absolute increases
1. Helen1. James
2. Mary2. William
3. Dorothy3. Robert
4. Mildred4. John
5. Margaret5. Edward

These baby names saw the largest increases in usage from 1908 to 1909 in terms of percentage of babies:

Girl names: Top relative increasesBoy names: Top relative increases
1. Laverna [2-way tie]1. Toney
2. Nevada [2-way tie]2. Cicero
3. Matilde [2-way tie]3. Angus
4. Susanne [2-way tie]4. Carol
5. Gayle [4-way tie]5. Alfonzo
6. Erin [4-way tie]
7. Ersie [4-way tie]
8. Marye [4-way tie]

Debut names

These were the baby names that debuted most impressively in the U.S. baby name data in 1909:

Girl names: Top debutsBoy names: Top debuts
1. Wilmoth1. Randal [2-way tie]
2. Belen [7-way tie]2. Vidal [2-way tie]
3. Cesaria [7-way tie]3. Colman [2-way tie]
4. Coretta [7-way tie]4. Sal [2-way tie]
5. Devota [7-way tie]5. Hilda [6-way tie]
6. Inola [7-way tie]6. Nunzio [6-way tie]
7. Kimiko [7-way tie]7. Ozell [6-way tie]
8. Luise [7-way tie]8. Rebecca [6-way tie]
9. Saverio [6-way tie]
10. Zigmund [6-way tie]

If you want to check out another year on the timeline, here’s the baby name timeline main page.

Finally, a few reminders about the Social Security Administration’s baby name data:

  • It only includes names given to at least five babies (of one gender or the other) per year.
  • It does contain mistakes such as misspelled names, misgendered names, and placeholder names (e.g., “Babygirl”).
  • It isn’t very accurate from 1880 to the mid-1930s. Why? Because the SSA was established in the mid-1930s, so the names in the dataset from 1880 to the mid-1930s are not the names of babies, but the names (or nicknames) of adults applying for social security numbers. More importantly, adults born during these decades who never applied for a number are simply not accounted for.

Data source: U.S. Social Security Administration