Will more babies be named Kindle?

Amazon Kindle

I’ve been wondering about Kindle lately. Nope, I’m not talking about the e-book reader. I’m talking about the baby name.

There are hundreds of Kindles already out there. (Humans, I mean. Amazon Kindles number in the millions.) What I wonder is whether the number of babies named Kindle every year will rise significantly in the near future.

Why would the number rise? Well, expectant parents have been hearing the word Kindle a lot lately, thanks to the popular e-reader. So they’re being continually reminded of it. And Kindle is very close to the name Kendall, which currently ranks 133rd for girls and 600th for boys. So parents might start seeing Kindle as a viable Kendall-alternative.

Here are the SSA’s stats on Kindle for the last decade:

  • 2009: 24 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2008: 20 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2007: 11 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2006: 17 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2005: 10 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2004: 13 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2003: 9 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2002: 8 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2001: 14 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2000: 10 baby girls named Kindle

So far, 24 is the record. It could be the start of an upward trend…or it could just be a temporary increase. It’s too early to tell.

Where do you think the name Kindle is headed within the next couple of years? Even better: How many babies do you think will be named Kindle in 2010?

Update, mid-2020: Here’s how the name has fared since I published this post ten years ago…

  • 2018: 12 baby girls and 5 baby boys named Kindle
  • 2017: 8 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2016: 19 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2015: 20 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2014: 16 baby girls named Kindle
  • 2013: 20 baby girls and 10 baby boys named Kindle
  • 2012: 22 baby girls and 7 baby boys named Kindle
  • 2011: 31 baby girls and 10 baby boys named Kindle
  • 2010: 22 baby girls named Kindle

Peak usage as a girl name was in 2011; peak usage as a boy name was in both 2011 and 2013.

Can Stuart be a girl name?

A reader recently wrote to me with this question:

My friend just had her fifth child, a girl, after having 4 boys. I was shocked to learn she named her Stuart. Is this EVER a girl’s name?

Yes…but very rarely.

Neither Stuart nor Stewart has appeared in the national baby name data set* since the turn of the century, but they both popped up a number of times during the ’80s and ’90s:

YearStuart
(girls)
Stuart
(boys)
Stewart
(girls)
Stewart
(boys)
1999.2417110
19985259.139
19977305.121
199653245172
19957396.169
1994.474.205
1993.450.226
19926519.233
199156665275
1990.7087282
1989.739.274
198866768268
198766596287
19865685.266
198510780.282
19845692.279
19837636.247
19826586.254
1981.596.248
1980.562.246

Both names were used for girls before the ’80s as well.

How do you feel about parents using Stuart/Stewart for baby girls?

*To be included in the SSA data, a name has to be used at least five times per year for either one or the other gender. So non-inclusion means that anywhere from 0 to 4 babies (of that specific gender) got the name that year.

Baby name story: Jesse Roper

USS Roper
USS Roper

This has to be the craziest birth story I’ve ever heard.

It was early 1942. Joseph and Desanka Mohorovicic and their daughter Visna, 2, were moving from Yugoslavia (recently invaded by the Axis) to the United States.

The family had traveled together as far as Cape Town, South Africa, but were split up when Desanka was refused passage on a ship to the U.S., possibly because she was 7 months pregnant. So she and Visna stayed behind while Joseph went ahead to New York, where he was to work as an attaché of the Yugoslav Consulate.

Desanka and Visna embarked a month later on the U.S. steamship City of New York.

They were near the end of their voyage when, on March 29, about 40 miles east of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, the City of New York was hit by a torpedo. It was under attack by German submarine U 160. The ship fired back, but when a second torpedo hit it began to sink. Dozens of crewmen and passengers were killed.

The survivors crowded onto lifeboats. The ship’s doctor, Dr. Leonard Hudson Conly, wisely followed Desanka and Visna onto their lifeboat. (He fractured two ribs while boarding, though.)

That night, Desanka went into labor. Dr. Conley had no anesthesia to offer her (or use for himself) and few medical instruments to work with. The lifeboat was being tossed about by 15-to-20-foot waves. It was dark, it was cold, and everyone was soaked with seawater. And, of course, at least one enemy U-boat was nearby.

Despite all this, Desanka gave birth to a baby boy in the wee hours of March 30.

“I didn’t have to wash the baby,” Dr. Leonard Conly would later say. “The sea did that for me.”

The destroyer USS Roper soon arrived to rescue the survivors and transport them to Norfolk, Virginia. The baby was later named Jesse Roper Mohorovicic after the rescue vessel, which had been named in honor of naval officer Jesse M. Roper (1851-1901).

Here’s a photo of the Mohorovicic family, minus Joseph.

Sadly, Jesse Roper Mohorovicic passed away just a few years ago, in 2005. (He was buried at sea.) But a few months before he passed, a grandson was born. One of the baby’s middle names? Roper, just like grandpa.*

Sources:

  • “Baby Born in Lifeboat Named for Rescue Ship.” New York Times 12 April 1942: 13.
  • Battle of the Atlantic: Birth in a Boat.” Time 13 Apr. 1942.
  • Cressman, Robert. The Official Chronology of the U.S. Navy in World War II. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2000.
  • Hickam, Homer H. Torpedo Junction: U-Boat War Off America’s East Coast, 1942. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1996.
  • Moritz, Owen. “WWII ‘Lifeboat Baby’ Dies at 63.” New York Daily News 15 Aug. 2005.
  • “‘Place of Birth’ Question Stumps Parents of ‘Lifeboat Baby.'” Pittsburgh Press 1 May 1942: 24.
  • Sea burial for grown ‘Lifeboat Baby’
  • “Wounded Doctor Delivers Baby as Waves Toss Lifeboat.” Evening Independent [St. Petersburg, FL] 2 Apr. 1942: 3.

Image: The National Archives, via NOAA

*Update, 2/4/2020: I recently received an email from Jesse’s daughter, Caroline, who let me know that her son’s full name is Jesse Roper Rees. (His grandfather’s New York Daily News obituary had him listed as “Joseph Roper Mohorovic Rees.”) Thank you, Caroline!

Where did the baby name Corelle come from in 1971?

Did your family own a set of Corelle?

Corelle dishware was introduced to consumers in 1970 by Corning Glass Works of New York. The product was aimed at middle-class Americans who wanted “a long-desired middle ground between paper plates and good china.”

The original marketing made sure to emphasize that a Corelle dish was translucent “like fine china” and “even rings like fine china.” But Corelle wasn’t fine china — it made from a lightweight, durable tempered glass product called Vitrelle (which was originally intended for first-generation television screens in the 1940s). This made it easy to handle, hard to break, and very affordable.

Popular Corelle patterns included Butterfly Gold, Old Towne Blue (above), Woodland Brown, and the wonderfully retro Spring Blossom Green. Clever hook-handles on the cups not only allowed for compact stacking, but also kept “your husband’s big fingers away from the bowl, so they can’t get burned.”

But enough with the nostalgia…what does all this have to do with baby names?

Well, the year after Corelle hit the market, the baby name Corelle appeared in the U.S. baby name data for the first and only time:

  • 1973: unlisted
  • 1972: unlisted
  • 1971: 5 baby girls named Corelle [debut]
  • 1970: unlisted
  • 1969: unlisted

This means that the Corelle marketing campaign not only boosted sales, but also boosted the brand name onto the baby name charts.

And this wasn’t an isolated case — there are many other examples of historical marketing campaigns inspiring American parents to name their babies after brands and products (such as Finesse, Jordache, Calizza, Monchel, L’erin, and dozens of perfumes).

What do you think of the baby name Corelle?

For you, is the association with vintage dishware a pro or a con? ;)

Sources: Corelle.com – History, Here’s why these plates make millions of people nostalgic, History of Stylish and Durable Dishware, SSA

Images from a 1974 magazine advertisement for Corelle Livingware by Corning.