How popular is the baby name Jeremy in the United States right now? How popular was it historically? Use the popularity graph and data table below to find out! Plus, see all the blog posts that mention the name Jeremy.
The graph will take a few moments to load. (Don't worry, it shouldn't take 9 months!) If it's taking too long, try reloading the page.
Maryland’s Open Data website includes a small table of popular baby names. It’s based on data from 2011, so it’s a bit out of date, but it does include top-10 lists for several different racial/ethnic groups.
This is cool because New York City does the very same breakdown, and we happen to have the equivalent NYC baby name rankings (2011). So we ought to be able to compare and contrast the two sets of rankings, right?
Yeah, that’s what I thought…until I started looking more closely at Maryland’s data.
According to the SSA, these were the top 10 boy names in Maryland in 2011:
Mason
Jacob
Michael
Ethan
Ryan
William
Alexander
Noah
Daniel
Aiden (tied for 10th)
Jayden (tied for 10th)
But according to the state of Maryland, the top 10 boy names were quite different:
Rank
OVERALL
Asian & Pacific Isl.
Black
Hispanic
White
1
Aiden
Aiden
Jaiden
Christopher
Lucas
2
Christopher
Lucas
Aiden
Anthony
Mason
3
Jayden
Alexander
Christopher
John
Jackson
4
Mason
Muhammed
Cameron
Alexander
Jacob
5
Lucas
Ethan
Elijah
Daniel
John
6
Jacob
Nathan
Jeremy
Matthew
Aiden
7
Alexander
John
Michael
Brian
Alexander
8
Nathan
Andrew
Isaiah
Justin
Liam
9
Michael
Justin
Mason
Jaiden
William
10
Ethan
Jacob
Caleb
Kevin
Ryan
It isn’t totally implausible that Aiden and Jayden ranked 1st and 3rd in 2011, but Christopher in 2nd? Maybe if this were a dataset from thirty years ago, but not five years ago. The SSA indicates that Christopher ranked closer to 18th in the state that year.
And what’s with the two different spellings of Jayden/Jaiden?
Plus there are some sizable raw number discrepancies, such as:
Aiden: 588 babies (MD data) vs. 281 babies (SSA data for MD)
Christopher: 584 babies (MD data) vs. 256 babies (SSA data for MD)
Jayden: 498 babies (MD data) vs. 281 babies (SSA data for MD)
Mason: 463 babies (MD data) vs. 432 babies (SSA data for MD)
And now the girl names. According to the SSA, these were the top 10 girl names in Maryland in 2011:
Sophia
Olivia
Isabella
Madison
Ava
Emma
Abigail
Chloe
Emily
Elizabeth
According to the state of Maryland, though, the top 10 girl names in the state were these:
Rank
OVERALL
Asian & Pacific Isl.
Black
Hispanic
White
1
Sophia
Sophia
Chloe
Sophia
Sophia
2
Isabel
Chloe
London
Emily
Isabel
3
Chloe
Isabel
Layla
Allison
Abigail
4
Ava
Caitlin/Kate
Madison
Isabel
Olivia
5
Madison
Hannah
Kennedy
Ashley
Ava
6
Olivia
Olivia
Aaliyah
Angelina
Riley
7
Emily
Sara(h)
McKenzie
Natalie
Madison
8
McKenzie
Abigail
Zoe(y)
Genesis
Emily
9
Abigail
Emily
Payton
Gabrielle
McKenzie
10
Riley
Lillian/Lily
Taylor
Kimberly
Chloe
Not only does Isabel magically replace Isabella in the Maryland data, but McKenzie and Riley rank 8th and 10th — even though the SSA says they should be closer to 77th (!) and 28th.
Not to mention the raw number discrepancies, such as:
Sophia: 503 babies (MD data) vs. 367 babies (SSA data for MD)
McKenzie: 325 babies (MD data) vs. 71 babies (SSA data for MD)
Riley: 298 babies (MD data) vs. 118 babies (SSA data for MD)
Intriguing parallels between the MD data and the NYC data do exist. In both locations, Elijah and Isaiah were in the top 10 for African-American boys only, and London, Aaliyah, and Taylor were in the top 10 for African-American girls only.
But if we can’t trust the data, we can’t draw any meaningful conclusions.
Labels like “Caitlin/Kate,” “Sara(h),” “Zoe(y)” and “Lillian/Lily” suggest that variant names were combined here and there. I suspect this is also what happened with Isabel/Isabella, Sophia/Sofia, Aiden, Jayden, MacKenzie, Riley, and maybe even Christopher (perhaps Maryland merged all the “Chris-” names?). What are your thoughts on this?
How has the ratio of Biblical names to non-Biblical names changed over time (if at all) among the most popular baby names in the U.S.?
This question popped into my head recently, so I thought I’d take a look at the data. We’ll do boy names today and girl names tomorrow.
First, let’s set some parameters. For these posts, “Biblical” names are personal names (belonging to either humans or archangels) mentioned in the Bible, plus all derivatives of these names, plus any other name with a specifically Biblical origin (e.g., Jordan, Sharon, Genesis). The “most popular” names are the top 20, and “over time” is the span of a century.
For boy names, the ratio of Biblical names to non-Biblical names has basically flipped over the last 100 years. Here’s a visual — Biblical names are in the yellow cells, non-Biblical names are in the green cells, and a borderline name (which I counted as non-Biblical) is in the orange cell:
Borderline name: Jerry (can be based on the Biblical name Jeremy/Jeremiah or on the non-Biblical names Jerome, Gerald, Gerard)
It felt strange putting an overtly Christian name like Christopher in the non-Biblical category, but it doesn’t appear anywhere in the Bible, so…that’s where it goes.
Here are the year-by-year tallies:
Year
Top 20 names given to…
# Biblical
# Non-Biblical
1914
40% of baby boys
5 (25%)
15 (75%)
1924
43% of baby boys
6 (30%)
14 (70%)
1934
43% of baby boys
7 (35%)
13 (65%)
1944
47% of baby boys
7 (35%)
13 (65%)
1954
46% of baby boys
11 (55%)
9 (45%)
1964
42% of baby boys
11 (55%)
9 (45%)
1974
38% of baby boys
11 (55%)
9 (45%)
1984
36% of baby boys
14 (70%)
6 (30%)
1994
27% of baby boys
14 (70%)
6 (30%)
2004
19% of baby boys
14 (70%)
6 (30%)
2014
14% of baby boys
14 (70%)
6 (30%)
But there’s a huge difference between sample sizes of 40% and 14%, so let’s also take a look at the 2014 top 100, which covers 42% of male births.
By my count, last year’s top 100 boy names were half Biblical, half non-Biblical:
Once upon a time, the U.S. Social Security Administration put out annual twin name rankings (that is, rankings of the pairs of baby names given most frequently to sets of U.S. twins).
It all started in 2005 with simple, single-list rankings. Things got more interesting in 2009, when the SSA began splitting the rankings into gender-specific sub-rankings. Then in 2012, nothing. The updates stopped coming.
Now we have seven years’ worth of official twin name data from the U.S. government…and that’s it.
I used to keep these rankings in my directory, but they are so out-of-date now that I think it’s best to archive them in a single blog post, for easy reference. So, without further ado, here are the top baby names for twins born in the United States from 2005 to 2011 (in reverse order):
1. Jacob, Joshua (55 sets) 2. Matthew, Michael (52) 3. Daniel, David (50) 4. Jayden, Jordan (41) 5. Jayden, Jaylen (38) 6. Elijah, Isaiah (36) 7. Isaac, Isaiah (36) 8. Ethan, Evan (31) 9. Logan, Lucas (31) 10. Logan, Luke (27) 11. Caleb, Joshua (24) 12. Landon, Logan (24) 13. Andrew, Matthew (23) 14. Nathan, Nicholas (23) 15. Brandon, Bryan (22) 16. Alexander, Benjamin (21) 17. Hayden, Hunter (21) 18. Alexander, Nicholas (20) 19. Gabriel, Michael (20) 20. Christian, Christopher (19) 21. Jordan, Justin (19) 22. Benjamin, Samuel (18) 23. James, John (18) 24. Jeremiah, Joshua (18) 25. John, Joseph (18) 26. Joseph, Joshua (18) 27. Jeremiah, Josiah (17) 28. Aiden, Ethan (16) 29. Jacob, Noah (16) 30. Alexander, Anthony (15) 31. Caleb, Jacob (15) 32. Ethan, Noah (15) 33. Jacob, Joseph (15) 34. James, William (15) 35. Andrew, Anthony (14) 36. Jacob, Zachary (14) 37. Nathan, Noah (14) 38. Aiden, Ashton (13) 39. Alexander, Michael (13) 40. Andrew, William (13) 41. Christopher, Nicholas (13) 42. Dylan, Logan (13) 43. Michael, Nicholas (13) 44. Thomas, William (13) 45. Aidan, Ethan (12) 46. Aiden, Jayden (12) 47. Alexander, Alexis (12) 48. Benjamin, Jacob (12) 49. Chance, Chase (12) 50. Jayden, Kayden (12)
1. Madison, Mason (34 sets) 2. Taylor, Tyler (30) 3. Addison, Aiden (18) 4. Emily, Ethan (16) 5. Emma, Evan (16) 6. Ella, Ethan (15) 7. Emma, Ethan (14) 8. Jayda, Jayden (13) 9. Jada, Jaden (12) 10. Aidan, Nadia (11) 11. Aiden, Ava (11) 12. Emma, William (11) 13. Madison, Matthew (11) 14. Anna, William (10) 15. Emily, Evan (10) 16. Emma, Jacob (10) 17. Emma, Noah (10) 18. Isabella, Isaiah (10) 19. Madison, Michael (10) 20. Addison, Andrew (9) 21. Chloe, Connor (9) 22. Emma, Jack (9) 23. Nicholas, Sophia (9) 24. Noah, Sophia (9) 25. Olivia, Owen (9) 26. Zachary, Zoe (9) 27. Zachary, Zoey (9) 28. Brian, Brianna (8) 29. Caleb, Chloe (8) 30. Ethan, Isabella (8) 31. Grace, John (8) 32. Isabella, Michael (8) 33. Jacob, Jillian (8) 34. Jada, Jayden (8) 35. James, Julia (8) 36. Landon, London (8) 37. Lily, Luke (8) 38. Olivia, William (8) 39. Samuel, Sophia (8) 40. Sophia, William (8) 41. Abigail, Alexander (7) 42. Abigail, Benjamin (7) 43. Alexander, Ava (7) 44. Andrea, Andrew (7) 45. Andrew, Emily (7) 46. Ava, John (7) 47. Ava, Noah (7) 48. Emily, Ryan (7) 49. Emma, James (7) 50. Hannah, Noah (7)
Observations on the 2009 rankings:
#9 and #44 on the girl-girl list are “Mackenzie, Madison” and “Madison, Mckenzie.”
#15 and #23 on the girl-girl list are both “Gabriella, Isabella.” There was probably supposed to be a spelling difference somewhere, but the SSA had the pairings listed identically.
#8, #9 and #34 on the girl-boy list are “Jayda, Jayden,” “Jada, Jaden” and “Jada, Jayden.”
#10 on the girl-boy list is “Aidan, Nadia” — the only pair of anagram names I’ve spotted on these twin lists (besides Heaven/Nevaeh, of course).
#26 and #27 on the girl-boy list are “Zachary, Zoe” and “Zachary, Zoey.”
Top twin names, 2008
(Gender combinations not specified.)
1. Jacob, Joshua (69 sets born in 2008) 2. Daniel, David (59) 3. Jayden, Jordan (56) 4. Ethan, Evan (50) 5. Taylor, Tyler (43) 6. Gabriella, Isabella (42) 7. Isaac, Isaiah (40) 8. Madison, Morgan (38) 9. Elijah, Isaiah (36) 10. Ella, Emma (35) 11. Landon, Logan (34) 12. Logan, Lucas (34) 13. Matthew, Michael (33) 14. Faith, Hope (29) 15. Isabella, Sophia (28) 16. Olivia, Sophia (28) 17. James, John (27) 18. Madison, Mason (27) 19. Brandon, Bryan (25) 20. Hailey, Hannah (25) 21. Mackenzie, Madison (25) 22. Nathan, Nicholas (25) 23. Addison, Aiden (24) 24. Caleb, Joshua (24) 25. Christian, Christopher (24) 26. Emma, Ethan (24) 27. Jayden, Jaylen (24) 28. Ava, Emma (23) 29. Ava, Olivia (23) 30. Joseph, Joshua (23) 31. Andrew, Matthew (22) 32. Makayla, Makenzie (22) 33. Benjamin, Samuel (21) 34. Brandon, Brian (21) 35. Abigail, Emma (20) 36. Jacob, Matthew (20) 37. Jordan, Justin (20) 38. Nathan, Noah (20) 39. Alexander, Andrew (19) 40. Emily, Ethan (19) 41. Ethan, Nathan (19) 42. Gabriel, Michael (19) 43. Hayden, Hunter (19) 44. Jacob, Joseph (19) 45. Addison, Avery (17) 46. Faith, Grace (17) 47. Jayda, Jayden (17) 48. Joshua, Justin (17) 49. Joshua, Matthew (17) 50. Alexander, Nicholas (16) 51. Emma, Sophie (16) 52. Jada, Jaden (16) 53. Logan, Luke (16) 54. Aaron, Andrew (15) 55. Andrew, Anthony (15) 56. Anna, Emma (15) 57. Autumn, Summer (15) 58. Isabella, Olivia (15) 59. Jacob, Jordan (15) 60. Jacob, Lucas (15) 61. Kyle, Ryan (15) 62. Nicholas, Noah (15) 63. Valeria, Vanessa (15) 64. Abigail, Benjamin (14) 65. Aiden, Ava (14) 66. Alexander, Benjamin (14) 67. Alexander, Christopher (14) 68. Ashley, Emily (14) 69. Benjamin, William (14) 70. Christopher, Matthew (14) 71. Daniel, Michael (14) 72. Dylan, Tyler (14) 73. Emma, Sophia (14) 74. Hannah, Sarah (14) 75. Heaven, Nevaeh (14) 76. Jake, Luke (14) 77. Jennifer, Jessica (14) 78. Mackenzie, Makayla (14) 79. Matthew, William (14) 80. Natalie, Nathan (14) 81. Ryan, Tyler (14) 82. Samuel, Sophia (14) 83. Samuel, William (14) 84. Addison, Emma (13) 85. Adrian, Adriana (13) 86. Aiden, Austin (13) 87. Alexander, Alexis (13) 88. Ava, Mia (13) 89. Benjamin, Jacob (13) 90. Benjamin, Matthew (13) 91. Caleb, Christian (13) 92. Caleb, Jacob (13) 93. Elijah, Ethan (13) 94. Jada, Jayden (13) 95. James, William (13) 96. John, William (13) 97. Lily, Logan (13) 98. Mark, Matthew (13) 99. Matthew, Nicholas (13) 100. Maxwell, Samuel (13)
Similarities in the 2008 rankings:
#19 and #34 are “Brandon, Bryan,” and “Brandon, Brian.”
#32 and #78 are “Makayla, Makenzie” and “Mackenzie, Makayla.”
#47, #52 and #94 are “Jayda, Jayden,” “Jada, Jaden” and “Jada, Jayden.”
Top twin names, 2007
(Gender combinations not specified.)
1. Jacob, Joshua (69 sets born in 2007) 2. Matthew, Michael (55) 3. Daniel, David (52) 4. Isaac, Isaiah (39) 5. Ella, Emma (38) 6. Madison, Morgan (36) 7. Taylor, Tyler (36) 8. Landon, Logan (35) 9. Brandon, Bryan (34) 10. Christian, Christopher (33) 11. Gabriella, Isabella (33) 12. Andrew, Matthew (32) 13. Faith, Hope (32) 14. Joseph, Joshua (31) 15. Ethan, Evan (30) 16. Jacob, Joseph (30) 17. Mackenzie, Madison (29) 18. Alexander, Benjamin (27) 19. Caleb, Joshua (26) 20. Hailey, Hannah (26) 21. Isabella, Sophia (26) 22. Madison, Matthew (26) 23. Emily, Ethan (25) 24. Joshua, Matthew (25) 25. Nathan, Nicholas (25) 26. Andrew, Anthony (24) 27. Jayden, Jordan (24) 28. Madison, Mason (24) 29. Elijah, Isaiah (23) 30. Alexander, Nicholas (22) 31. Jeremiah, Joshua (22) 32. Emma, Ethan (21) 33. Olivia, Sophia (21) 34. Ava, Emma (20) 35. Haley, Hannah (20) 36. Hayden, Hunter (20) 37. Jacob, Zachary (20) 38. Logan, Luke (20) 39. Natalie, Nathan (20) 40. Benjamin, Samuel (19) 41. Christopher, Nicholas (19) 42. Nathan, Noah (19) 43. Alexander, Christopher (18) 44. James, John (18) 45. John, William (18) 46. Jordan, Justin (18) 47. Megan, Morgan (18) 48. Alexander, Anthony (17) 49. Andrew, William (17) 50. Christopher, Matthew (17) 51. Isabella, Olivia (17) 52. Jacob, Jordan (17) 53. Joseph, Michael (17) 54. Alexander, Andrew (16) 55. Andrew, Jacob (16) 56. Elijah, Ethan (16) 57. Jacob, Matthew (16) 58. Jacob, Samuel (16) 59. James, Joseph (16) 60. Jordan, Joshua (16) 61. Matthew, Ryan (16) 62. Nicholas, Noah (16) 63. Ava, Olivia (15) 64. Emma, Grace (15) 65. Emma, Hannah (15) 66. Jason, Justin (15) 67. Jennifer, Jessica (15) 68. Makayla, Makenzie (15) 69. Natalie, Nicole (15) 70. Zachary, Zoe (15) 71. Ava, Sophia (14) 72. Benjamin, Jacob (14) 73. Emma, Olivia (14) 74. Ethan, Nathan (14) 75. Gabriel, Michael (14) 76. Grace, Olivia (14) 77. Jacob, Justin (14) 78. Jacob, Tyler (14) 79. Jaden, Jordan (14) 80. Jonathan, Joshua (14) 81. Jose, Juan (14) 82. Logan, Lucas (14) 83. Mark, Matthew (14) 84. Robert, William (14) 85. Samuel, Sophia (14) 86. Abigail, Emily (13) 87. Abigail, Emma (13) 88. Alexander, William (13) 89. Anna, Emma (13) 90. Ashley, Emily (13) 91. Ava, Ella (13) 92. Cameron, Christian (13) 93. Emily, Sarah (13) 94. Emma, Jacob (13) 95. Emma, William (13) 96. Grace, Hannah (13) 97. Hannah, Sarah (13) 98. Jayden, Jaylen (13) 99. Joseph, Nicholas (13) 100. Joshua, Zachary (13) 101. Madison, Megan (13) 102. Parker, Preston (13)
Similarities in the 2007 rankings:
#20 and #35 are “Hailey, Hannah” and “Haley, Hannah.”
#27 and #79 are “Jayden, Jordan” and “Jaden, Jordan.”
Top twin names, 2006
(Gender combinations not specified.)
1. Jacob, Joshua (67 sets born in 2006) 2. Matthew, Michael (54) 3. Daniel, David (52) 4. Ella, Emma (38) 5. Isaac, Isaiah (38) 6. Madison, Morgan (36) 7. Landon, Logan (35) 8. Taylor, Tyler (35) 9. Brandon, Bryan (34) 10. Christian, Christopher (33) 11. Gabriella, Isabella (33) 12. Andrew, Matthew (32) 13. Faith, Hope (31) 14. Ethan, Evan (30) 15. Jacob, Joseph (30) 16. Joseph, Joshua (29) 17. Mackenzie, Madison (29) 18. Alexander, Benjamin (27) 19. Hailey, Hannah (27) 20. Madison, Matthew (26) 21. Caleb, Joshua (25) 22. Emily, Ethan (25) 23. Isabella, Sophia (25) 24. Joshua, Matthew (25) 25. Nathan, Nicholas (25) 26. Andrew, Anthony (24) 27. Jayden, Jordan (24) 28. Madison, Mason (24) 29. Elijah, Isaiah (22) 30. Jeremiah, Joshua (22) 31. Alexander, Nicholas (21) 32. Emma, Ethan (21) 33. Olivia, Sophia (21) 34. Ava, Emma (20) 35. Hayden, Hunter (20) 36. Logan, Luke (20) 37. Natalie, Nathan (20) 38. Christopher, Nicholas (19) 39. Haley, Hannah (19) 40. Jacob, Zachary (19) 41. John, William (19) 42. Nathan, Noah (19) 43. Benjamin, Samuel (18) 44. James, John (18) 45. Jordan, Justin (18) 46. Megan, Morgan (18) 47. Alexander, Anthony (17) 48. Isabella, Olivia (17) 49. Jacob, Jordan (17) 50. Joseph, Michael (17) 51. Nicholas, Noah (17) 52. Alexander, Andrew (16) 53. Alexander, Christopher (16) 54. Andrew, Jacob (16) 55. Christopher, Matthew (16) 56. Elijah, Ethan (16) 57. Jacob, Samuel (16) 58. James, Joseph (16) 59. Matthew, Ryan (16) 60. Ava, Olivia (15) 61. Emma, Grace (15) 62. Emma, Hannah (15) 63. Jacob, Matthew (15) 64. Jaden, Jordan (15) 65. Jason, Justin (15) 66. Jordan, Joshua (15) 67. Makayla, Makenzie (15) 68. Zachary, Zoe (15) 69. Abigail, Emily (14) 70. Andrew, William (14) 71. Benjamin, Jacob (14) 72. Emma, Olivia (14) 73. Ethan, Nathan (14) 74. Gabriel, Michael (14) 75. Hannah, Sarah (14) 76. Jacob, Justin (14) 77. Jacob, Tyler (14) 78. Jennifer, Jessica (14) 79. Jonathan, Joshua (14) 80. Jose, Juan (14) 81. Mark, Matthew (14) 82. Natalie, Nicole (14) 83. Samuel, Sophia (14) 84. Abigail, Emma (13) 85. Alexander, William (13) 86. Anna, Emma (13) 87. Ashley, Emily (13) 88. Ava, Sophia (13) 89. Cameron, Christian (13) 90. Emily, Sarah (13) 91. Emma, Jacob (13) 92. Grace, Hannah (13) 93. Grace, Olivia (13) 94. Jayden, Jaylen (13) 95. Joseph, Nicholas (13) 96. Joshua, Zachary (13) 97. Logan, Lucas (13) 98. Madison, Megan (13) 99. Parker, Preston (13) 100. Robert, William (13)
Similarities in the 2006 rankings:
#19 and #39 are “Hailey, Hannah” and “Haley, Hannah.”
#27 and #64 are “Jayden, Jordan” and “Jaden, Jordan.”
Top twin names, 2005
(Gender combinations not specified.)
1. Jacob, Joshua (78 sets born in 2005) 2. Matthew, Michael (70) 3. Daniel, David (63) 4. Faith, Hope (49) 5. Ethan, Evan (43) 6. Taylor, Tyler (42) 7. Isaac, Isaiah (37) 8. Joseph, Joshua (37) 9. Nathan, Nicholas (37) 10. Madison, Mason (33) 11. Hailey, Hannah (32) 12. Madison, Morgan (32) 13. Alexander, Andrew (29) 14. Elijah, Isaiah (28) 15. Jordan, Justin (28) 16. Mackenzie, Madison (27) 17. Alexander, Nicholas (25) 18. Caleb, Joshua (25) 19. Emma, Ethan (25) 20. Jonathan, Joshua (25) 21. Emily, Ethan (24) 22. Alexander, Benjamin (23) 23. Andrew, Matthew (23) 24. Benjamin, Samuel (23) 25. James, John (23) 26. Matthew, Nicholas (23) 27. Brandon, Brian (22) 28. Ella, Emma (22) 29. Alexander, Zachary (21) 30. Dylan, Tyler (21) 31. Hannah, Sarah (21) 32. Madison, Matthew (21) 33. Christian, Christopher (20) 34. Faith, Grace (20) 35. Jacob, Jordan (20) 36. Jacob, Matthew (20) 37. Jaden, Jordan (20) 38. Alexander, Anthony (19) 39. Brandon, Bryan (19) 40. Emily, Sarah (19) 41. Ethan, Nathan (19) 42. Jacob, Joseph (19) 43. Jordan, Joshua (19) 44. Landon, Logan (19) 45. Olivia, Sophia (19) 46. Ashley, Emily (18) 47. Elizabeth, Emily (18) 48. Elizabeth, Katherine (18) 49. Jeremy, Joshua (18) 50. John, Joseph (18) 51. Nathan, Noah (18) 52. Nicholas, Noah (18) 53. Nicholas, Zachary (18) 54. Alexander, Christopher (17) 55. Christopher, Michael (17) 56. Jacob, Zachary (17) 57. Jason, Justin (17) 58. Abigail, Allison (16) 59. Amy, Emily (16) 60. Andrew, Nicholas (16) 61. Benjamin, William (16) 62. Christopher, Nicholas (16) 63. Ella, Ethan (16) 64. Gabriella, Isabella (16) 65. Isabella, Sophia (16) 66. Jeremiah, Joshua (16) 67. Megan, Morgan (16) 68. Samuel, Sophia (16) 69. Aidan, Ava (15) 70. Alexander, Alexis (15) 71. Andrew, Anthony (15) 72. Andrew, Ethan (15) 73. Andrew, William (15) 74. Ava, Olivia (15) 75. Caleb, Jacob (15) 76. Jacob, Nicholas (15) 77. Jacob, Ryan (15) 78. Jake, Luke (15) 79. Jayden, Jordan (15) 80. John, William (15) 81. Mark, Matthew (15) 82. Natalie, Nathan (15) 83. Nathaniel, Nicholas (15) 84. Ryan, Tyler (15) 85. Abigail, Emily (14) 86. Anna, Emma (14) 87. Anthony, Michael (14) 88. Anthony, Nicholas (14) 89. Austin, Justin (14) 90. Benjamin, Jacob (14) 91. Brian, Brianna (14) 92. Christopher, Matthew (14) 93. Daniel, Samuel (14) 94. Gabriel, Michael (14) 95. Haley, Hannah (14) 96. Jada, Jaden (14) 97. Jayden, Jaylen (14) 98. Jonathan, Joseph (14) 99. Kyle, Ryan (14) 100. Logan, Lucas (14) 101. Logan, Luke (14) 102. Matthew, Ryan (14) 103. Parker, Payton (14) 104. Parker, Peyton (14) 105. Reagan, Riley (14) 106. Tanner, Tyler (14)
Similarities in the 2005 rankings:
#11 and #95 are “Hailey, Hannah” and “Haley, Hannah.”
#27 and #39 are “Brandon, Brian” and “Brandon, Bryan.”
#37 and #79 are “Jaden, Jordan” and “Jayden, Jordan.”
#103 and #104 are “Parker, Payton” and “Parker, Peyton.”
The animated TV series Jem, which began airing in late 1985, focused on an all-girl rock band called Jem and the Holograms.
Jem was the lead singer, and she had a big secret: she didn’t really exist! “Jem” was just the alter-ego of a woman named Jerrica Benton, who used a powerful holographic computer (called Synergy) and a pair of hi-tech earrings to have the “Jem” hologram projected over her.
The Name Jem
Before Jem, there had been girls named Gem and boys named Jem (short for Jeremy/Jeremiah/James). But only in 1986 do baby girls named Jem start popping up in the U.S. baby name data:
1989: 6 baby girls named Jem
1988: 9 baby girls named Jem
1987: 11 baby girls named Jem
1986: 5 baby girls named Jem [debut]
1985: unlisted
1984: unlisted
The Name Jerrica
The Jessica-like name Jerrica was in use well before the cartoon started airing, but without Jem it might never have cracked the top 1,000:
1989: 402 baby girls named Jerrica [ranked 558th]
1988: 437 baby girls named Jerrica [ranked 506th]
1987: 318 baby girls named Jerrica [ranked 607th]
1986: 199 baby girls named Jerrica [ranked 836th]
1985: 64 baby girls named Jerrica
1984: 45 baby girls named Jerrica
Jerrica managed to stay in the top 1,000 all the way through 1995. It’s still in the SSA data today, though the numbers aren’t too impressive anymore (i.e., only 27 baby girls were named Jerrica in 2009).
This website or its third-party tools process personal data.In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by using the link Do not sell my personal information.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.